Take Your Tolls and Shove Them!

by lewwaters

Once again we are being treated to more propaganda designed to assuage our angst over having tolls and Portland’s light rail shoved down our throats, whether or not we want it. The Friday, July 30 Columbian has yet another editorial promoting Portland’s light rail and tolls on a new I-5 Bridge, In our view: Bridge Progress telling us, “New Metro study reduces concerns about sprawl in Clark County.”

Personally, I’ve lost count of these “studies” that all seem to agree we need to just roll over and embrace losing more of our money to a boondoggle from Portland and to be happy to pay more to cross the Columbia River, just to get to work for many.

But, this editorial is designed to lessen our concern over “sprawl.” We are told,

“Portland’s Metro agency announced Wednesday that a new analysis shows a new bridge with tolls and light rail will have negligible effect in fueling sprawl in Clark County.”

From what I recall hearing at the City Council Town Hall, sprawl is not the worry, but vacating the area is, as jobs and residents discover the expense of having to pay to cross the Columbia River as often as they will have to.

Oddly enough, Metro Council President David Bragdon is quoted saying in regards to this “new study,”

“[it] underscores the importance of tolls and light rail to this project” and will “help Vancouver reach its goal of a compact, walkable downtown area while also improving access for households that live in North Portland and work in Vancouver.”

Where does it help all of the Clark County residents that hold jobs in Portland? Isn’t the “rush hour” heading to Portland in the mornings and reversed in the evenings? I don’t recall the handful of Portland residents that work here having much difficulty crossing the bridge to get to work lately.

Craig Riley, candidate for the 49th Legislative District, position 2 against Jim Moeller, recently expressed his concern of this scenario at a Vancouver City Council meeting about a valued employee of his that lives in Oregon City and commutes. He pays the employees gas fare to help with expenses for the lengthy drive now. Will he have to add more expense to his business to cover tolls too?

But, by and large, it is Clark County residents that will pay through the nose to travel to Oregon to work. Are employers there willing to grant pay raises to cover the added expense of their thousands of employees? I hardly think so.

For those that lived here in the 1970’s, when the 205 Bridge was being as heavily debated, and opposed by Portland and Oregon, recall it was built eventually and no one has had to pay tolls on it, ever. Hints have been dropped that tolls might be added to it now to ensure traffic is not diverted to it to avoid paying tolls on a new I-5 Bridge and to help pay for it all.

How did they pay for the I-205 Bridge and not stick tolls to it?

If you will recall, less than a year after being selected as our new governor, Christine Gregoire imposed a 9.5 cent increase in tax per gallon of gas we are still paying, 5 years later. On September 14, 2005, the Columbian ran an article, “Gregoire says gas tax crucial to transportation, business,” about governor Gregoire coming to Clark County to justify the tax increase.

Standing on the intersection of Chkalov Drive and Mill Plain Boulevard explaining that our gas taxes were going to the Alaskan Way Viaduct in Seattle, Gregoire said,

“Today it’s Seattle and the viaduct; tomorrow it’s Clark County and the bridges to Portland. Someday I’m going to ask the citizens in King County to invest in Clark County.”

Well, it look like someday has arrived and what do we hear? Pay Tolls and the increased gas tax, along with every other tax and fee raised this last legislative session.

Why isn’t the Columbian’s editorial board and our elected officials fighting for Governor Gregoire to keep her word?

Visit and support NoTolls.com and let’s work together for an affordable solution that will really benefit Clark County.

8 Comments to “Take Your Tolls and Shove Them!”

  1. Thanks for writing about this subject. Please consider doing a focus article on Alan Svehaug, running for County Commissioner, who is adamantly against bridge tolls and has legitimate ideas for a third bridge and alternatives of fractional cost, involving the use of gas-tax dollars instead of double-taxation tolls.


  2. Cory, isn’t it nice to have something we can agree on? 😉

    I’ve met Alan and intend to write more about him in the weeks ahead.

    I sat in on one meeting where alternatives were being discussed and think there just might be some really good ideas coming from him and NoTolls.com.

    Light rail from Portland is really of minimal benefit to us and will be a major pain, as well as a major expense that will have to be subsidized with taxes.

    There will be a lot more on this in the weeks ahead.


  3. Yes….what’s wrong with the idea of a 3rd bridge? Whether it’s located west of I-5 or east of I-205. And let’s leave a perfectly stable & well- built bridge alone. Even placement of a 3rd bridge somewhere in between the 2 Interstates makes more sense.

    According to a report by the Columbian in the business section on 7/27, the traffic on I-205 has increased each & every year since 2008, while average traffic on I-5 has stayed about the same. And this, in spite of all the construction tie-ups on I-205.

    Population density calls for another bridge eastward of I-5.


  4. I agree with you Susan. Then again, I suppose, it just makes too much sense. We can not understand why the Light Rail is being so violently pushed on us. The cost is astronomically outrageous.

    A third bridge would be a pleasant addition to our state.


  5. I love it when conservative stab each other in the back. President Knight at Clark College wholeheartedly supports the bridge and toll. Why not publish the names of the conservatives of Vancouver that support the bridge and toll so the rest of us can enjoy watching the Clark County Conservatives play the role of backstabbers.


  6. Interesting comment. So, now the I-5 boondoggle and Loot Rail is some sort of conservative conspiracy?

    Hate to tell you, but opposition to it is one of the few areas that many liberals and conservatives have found common ground on.

    Likewise, backing for it, many agreeing from both sides of the aisle.


  7. I did not know that Bob Knight is a Conservative, sure as hell did fool me. LOL I mean, like, really, big time.

    Seriously? Like this is a totally wow moment for me.


Leave a Reply. Comments are moderated. Spam & off topic comments will not be approved at Blog Author's discretion. THIS IS NOT A FREE SPEECH ZONE!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: