Ron Paul, Still Blaming America

by lewwaters

Ron Paul, whiner extraordinaire, known for blaming America for the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks that murdered 3,000 of our citizens, is at it again. Or is it still?

According to Paul, the “mess” in Egypt is once again, “America’s fault.”

From the, Paul says, “This is a typical example of what happens when we run on intervention-type foreign policies. We get in the middle of these fights. We’ve been in the middle of this for 30 years now. We’ve given Mubarak $60 billion. We’re responsible for a lot of the mess that is over there.”

His answer? “I wouldn’t just cut off Egyptian aid. I’d cut off all aid to the Middle East and maybe that whole area would be better off for it.”

Yes, Iran would step in deeper, Israel would be annihilated and every gain made in the last few years helping the Iraqi people find freedom and set on the path towards self-determination would be squandered, not to mention the sacrifices made by our Brave Troops completely invalidated, once again.

I am sure the Muslim Brotherhood is pleased to receive the support of congressman Ron Paul.

3 Comments to “Ron Paul, Still Blaming America”

  1. I think you forgot to put “Neo-” in front of “Conservative” in your website title, Mr. Warmonger.

    It’s people with a mindset that you are emulating in this article who are sending our children to die in wars created by the BIS and central banksters in collusion with global weapons manufacturers (the Military Industrial Complex that Eisenhower warned us of)… all for money and funded by American taxpayers (even those yet unborn).

    At least Ron Paul follows the letter of the law… the supreme law, the US Constitution and walks his talk, unlike your Neo-Con buddies, led by their mentor, the ultimate coward, Bill Kristol.


  2. Is that the best you can do John? Resort to name calling like a 2nd grader?

    Oh yes, Ron Paul, the new messiah to people like you. The congressman who rails on against earmarks, then inserts more of them into bills than any other, then votes againist them knowing they will pass and in the end, he gets to talk how he opposes them, but benefits from bringing the pork to his district, buying votes.

    And yes, by all means, let’s pull everyone back to within our borders and just wait until we have war on our streets. After all, we deserved what happened on September 11, 2001, right?

    But, since you claim that he “follows the letter of the law… the supreme law, the US Constitution and walks his talk,” how does he support federal enforcement of immigration?

    That is not in the constitution, but was said to be “implied,” just as many other points the courts have ruled that we disagree with.

    How do you justify picking and choosing as he does? You can’t have it both ways, John. If only his interpretation is to be accepted, we cease being a Constitutional Republic and become a dictatorship under Ron Paul!

    As for Eisenhower’s speech, you really ought to read or listen to the entire speech. He also said, “We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars among great nations. Three of these involved our own country. Despite these holocausts America is today the strongest, the most influential and most productive nation in the world. Understandably proud of this pre-eminence, we yet realize that America’s leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment.”


    A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.”

    “Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.”

    “Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions…”

    You can’t pick and choose, John.


  3. John is just another example of a looney Ron Paul supporter! FWIW, Bill Kristol doesn’t have much say-so in things. Rush Limbaugh has more influence than Kristol. And the conspiracy theories about “bankers?”. Gimme a break!


Leave a Reply. Comments are moderated. Spam & off topic comments will not be approved at Blog Author's discretion. THIS IS NOT A FREE SPEECH ZONE!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: