Furor Over “Free Birth Control” Just A Lot of Hot Air

by lewwaters

“I want it and I want it now!”

How many times have we heard commercials with that sentence? It seems to now be part of the left’s push towards socialized medicine, beginning with “free birth control,” as evidenced by a female heckler towards GOP presidential candidate, Mitt Romney.

This is but the latest in a series of phony calls from Democrats in fabricating a GOP “war on women” that has grown from the testimony given by supposed Law Student Sandra Fluke weeks ago. That she appears to be trained and well entrenched leftist activist as well isn’t reported, though.

Her cry of birth control for women not be covered by health insurance has resonated across the land as our ‘lamestream media’ that promotes the march to socialism echoes the call daily. But is that even a true stand?

What also doesn’t make the news is that this is not the first time this has come up. In the 2008 campaign, Senator John McCain was confronted with the question, “It’s unfair that health insurance companies cover Viagra but not birth control. Do you have an opinion on that?”

McCain stumbled in reply, “I don’t know enough about it to give you an informed answer.”

That caused FactCheck.org to investigate the claim and they concluded in 2008,

“The premise of the reporter’s question is a myth. We couldn’t find any data that show a disparity between health insurance companies that cover Viagra and those that cover birth control. The full range of contraceptives, in fact, are covered by more than 86 percent of private insurance plans written for employers.”

Thirteen years ago, 1999 the New York Times reported,

“Around the country, more than a half-dozen state legislatures, swayed largely by insurers’ coverage of Viagra treatment, have recently passed measures requiring carriers that cover prescription drugs to pay for women’s contraceptives as well. More states are expected to follow.”

No, not every insurance policy will cover birth control, but a significant number already do. That gives us a choice. Not everyone wants Viagra or Birth Control and added coverage also adds costs to premiums. Those who want it covered have the choice just as those who don’t want or need also have a choice.

So what is the entire outcry about?

I am of the mind that it is just another play on our innate compassion for others being used against us to push towards full socialized medicine provided “free” by the government. We already see the cry for free drugs for addicts or at least lower costs under calls for legalization. We see Transgender wanting to be given free sex change operations. These are but 2 examples and where does it end? Nothing is free. Someone must pay for it.

A commonly asked question in this ongoing debate, “As a society do we really want women who can’t afford birth control and don’t want babies to be having them?” The implication is that providing “free” birth control costs us less in the long run.

Not addressed is what of those who want more babies to increase the amount of “free” money received through welfare? What of those women who don’t want birth control due to adverse side effects? Do we force drug addicted women or the professional poverty class to take them or be sterilized so they stop popping out babies?

People must become responsible for themselves again. What have we become that we allow our sexual urges to control us? Where does the “I want it free and I want it now” attitude end?

Do we give everybody a house so they don’t end up sick from sleeping out in the weather? The argument that we must supply them birth control so they don’t produce babies that we must care for is an emotional argument to dull our senses to the real goal, socialized medicine.

Planned Parenthood reports they provide birth control from $15 to $50 a month. WalMart sells birth control for less than $10. Where is the urgent need? It’s available and affordable already. But think a moment. Most insurance policies have a co-pay on prescriptions of maybe $15 to $20 for generics and $35 to $40 for name brand prescriptions. Where is the savings for these people with it available at such a low price as WalMart provides? Is the effort to end co-pays and place more of the burden for other people’s choices in the lap of an employer?

No, it’s time we stood and called the leftists and Democrats on this. The disparity claim being used is a myth, just as FactCheck told us back in 2008.

Birth control is widely available and affordable for those who want it.

The whole argument is just a lot of hot air!

11 Comments to “Furor Over “Free Birth Control” Just A Lot of Hot Air”

  1. “Do we force drug addicted women or the professional poverty class to take them or be sterilized so they stop popping out babies?”

    Actually, Lew, that is a damn good idea. May not be any way to do it legally tho. Perhaps this would be a case where subsidizing drugs to addicts in exchange for reversible sterilization makes sense.

    “People must become responsible for themselves again. What have we become that we allow our sexual urges to control us?”

    Almost by definition they don’t have self control. With the exception of victims of surgery gone bad or other errors by medical practitioners, they wouldn’t be addicts otherwise.


  2. Nobody should be forced to pay for somebody else’s sexual “exercises”. Period.


  3. If you recall, Tom, forced sterilization on some was tried in this country before. http://www.cfif.org/htdocs/freedomline/current/in_our_opinion/un_sterile_past.html

    While it may sound like a good idea, is it much different that Hitler’s “Master Race?”

    I mentioned it as an aside to “free birth control” and a potential slippery slope.

    As far as self control is concerned, that muct be taught and sadly, today’s “I want it and I want it now” attitudes negate the whole concept of self control, much to the detriment of society.


  4. I say it takes two sides of a coin. If a man or a woman is engaging in sexual relations, they are the ones who should bare 100 percent responsibility for their actions, “IF” they get pregnant.

    Maybe I’m a youngin’ who believes in personal responsibility and common sense. I don’t care if your married or single in this case. I can go to almost any grocery store, pharmacy or similar in-between and get from condoms to stronger or bigger varied devices.

    Look, it is not just the ladies issue here. If men can deal with the getting boners and being just as 100 percent responsible, then may they should also get snipped or better YET, ding them every single child they bring into this wonderful, world? I seriously mean, if that mother goes on welfare, that man become 100 percent responsible for every single DIME that mother takes out of society.

    May be if we actually nailed every single *parent* (which includes woman that for other reasons can’t keep the child and it goes to family or the father) should be paying as well. (unless there is some form of mental disorder….)


  5. And one final point. I believe it is not societies job to baby sit adults (and teenagers) fooling around. If people are dumb enough to earn this reward, they are smart enough to live the lifetime of sacrifice and heartache and the possibility of catching varying forms of STD’s or bring a un-necessary child into the world.


  6. Actually Lew I wasn’t proposing forced sterilization, but rather voluntary (and reversible) in exchange for government support. This is a far cry from what Hitler did, and even what was done earlier in our country.


  7. We could accomplish the same thing, in theory, by removing support from anyone on the dole who makes additional babies, but that would require self-control which, as you pointed out, is lacking.


  8. Tom, don’t you think it would be perceived as a forced sterilization? I’m not too sure on the viability of reversing sterilization.

    While Hitler’s Eugenics was not voluntary, just as America’s before Germany’s wasn’t, that history alone would cause the ACLU and liberals to block any effort to impliment it. Hitler comes into the equation as I feel it very likely would lead down the slippery slope to compulsory sterilization if the left ever did embrace it as they have assisted suicide and abortion.

    I agree with you in concept, but as you said, it would never be legalized in this country.

    Just look at the opposition to pee tests for welfare recipients.


  9. Would be nice if we could, Tom.


  10. I have no problem with pee tests for assistance? And with the 5 year lifetime limit of benefits, it would be just one tool in box for the people who really need it, get it and not some one who does not want to follow the rules, gets cut off or they might come up with a graduated response.

    How are they going to handle medical marijuana cards, Tom?

    And for the reversible sterilization, I think there should be no gender bias there. Men must undergo it too.


  11. Medical marijuana cards only exist because of the federal government’s stupidity about cannabis. If that gets fixed, then cannabis would be treated like any other prescription drug.


Leave a Reply. Comments are moderated. Spam & off topic comments will not be approved at Blog Author's discretion. THIS IS NOT A FREE SPEECH ZONE!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: